There Is No Christianity without Miracles

So that, upon the whole, we may conclude, that the Christian religion not only was at first attended with miracles, but even at this day cannot be believed by an reasonable person without one. Mere reason is insufficient to convince us of its veracity: And whoever is moved by Faith to assent to it, is conscious of a continued miracle in his own person, which subverts all the principles of his understanding, and gives him a determination to believe what is most contrary to custom and experience.

-Davide Hume, An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 186.

C. S. Lewis Uses Hume

Reading through Hume’s “Of Miracles” in An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, I suddenly realized that C. S. Lewis adopts the same logic in his book, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. Hume’s line goes as follows:

If the falsehood of his testimony would be more miraculous, than the event which he relates; then and not till then, can he pretend to command my belief or opinion.

-David Hume,  An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 174.

Those familiar with The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe should immediately think of this scene:

“How do you know,” he asked, “that your sister’s story is not true?”

“Ooh, but–” began Susan, and then stopped. Anyone could see form the old man’s face that he was perfectly serious. Then Susan pulled herself together and said, “But Edmund said they had only been pretending.”

“That is a point,” said the Professor, “which certainly deserves consideration; very careful consideration. For instance–if you will excuse me for asking the question–does your experience lead you to regard your brother or your sister as the more reliable? I mean, which is the more truthful?”

“That’s just the funny thing about it, sir,” said Peter. “Up till now, I’d have said Lucy every time.”

“And what do you think, my dear?” said the Professor turning to Susan.

“Well,” said Susan, “in general, I’d say the same as Peter, but this couldn’t be true–all this about the wood and the Faun.”

“That is more than I know,” said the Professor, “and a charge of lying against someone whom you have always found truthful is a  very serious thing; a very serious thing indeed.”

“We were afraid it mightn’t even be lying,” said Susan; “we thought there might be something wrong with Lucy.”

“Madness, you mean?” said the Professor quite coolly. “Oh, you can make your minds easy about that. One has only to look at her and talk to her to see that she is not mad.”

“But then,” said Susan, and stopped. She had never dreamed that a grown-up would talk like the Professor and didn’t know what to think.

“Logic!” said the Professor half to himself. “Why don’t they teach logic at these schools? There are only three possibilities. Either your sister is telling lies, or she is mad, or she is telling the truth. You know she doesn’t tell lies and it is obvious that she is not mad. For the moment then and unless any further evidence turns up, we must assume that she is telling the truth.”

-C. S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (New York: HarperTrophy, 1978), 47-48.